As someone who had the priviledge of sitting on the GJA Media Awards Committee in 2009, I have taken particular interest in these awards, and have also questioned the role of sponsors in the running of the whole show. Coming across this article was refreshing. As to whether GJA will respond, too, is another matter! Happy reading!
===========
Source: Ghanaian Chronicle -
Ghanaian Chronicle
from: http://www.modernghana.com/news/350439/1/dishonesty-of-gja-awards.html
The 16 th Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) Awards ceremony
held at the Banquet Hall, State House in Accra on Friday, September 9,
2011, failed to pass the test of excellence and honesty in many
respects.
Apart from the poor organization of the
event, there were many critical issues that smack of dishonesty, and to a
large extent, corruption. I wish to articulate hereunder a few of the
issues that have come to my attention and hope you will publish them in
order to get answers and cure the wrongs in the system.
The
first issue that ought to be addressed is about money raised for the
organization of last Friday's event. Almost everything was sponsored,
including the venue, laptops given to award winners, drinks and many
more. The only things not sponsored were, perhaps, allowances given to
award committee members, plaques given to award winners, food and
protocol service.
So the question is what does the GJA executive
use all the huge amount of money they receive as sponsorship packages
for? Why is it that in spite of the huge cash sponsorship, award winners
are not given a pesewa, even when sponsors make cash donations for
winners of specific award categories?
I think there is the need
for the GJA executive to account for the organization of the awards
ceremony. It's not clear whether accounts were rendered for previous
award ceremonies (I stand to be corrected).
The second issue has
to do with how an award category for the best reporter on social
security was smuggled into the event. To the best of my knowledge,
social security reporting was NOT part of the award categories announced
by the GJA, when it opened entries earlier in the year, (you may want
to refer to media publications on the announcement for filing of
entries).
Indeed, just about two months ago, and long after
entries for the 2010 GJA Awards had been closed, the Social Security and
National Insurance Trust (SSNIT) announced (published in the media)
that it would sponsor a GJA Award category on social security reporting
for next year. The understanding is that journalists who cover the
social security issues this year will have their stories accessed for
the GJA Awards in 2012.
So how come an award was given to
someone in that category last Friday. It was no wonder that the citation
accompanying that award did not cite a specific story that the award
winning journalist did, that earned him that grand title just as in the
case of all the other categories.
The citation just made
reference to the fact that the award winning journalist had been doing
follow-up stories on social security.
If SSNIT wanted to show appreciation to a reporter who covers the social security beat,
Management
could have simply called the reporter to the SSNIT headquarters to do
that, and not to use a GJA platform for the celebration of journalism
excellence for that purpose.
The fact that the social security
award category was not opened for all to contest was very unfair, and
indeed, corruption to allow anyone to carry a GJA plaque and title for
that. The GJA must come clean on this.
Another award category
that smacks of dishonesty is how someone was adjudged the best reporter
for sports, but when everything was done and the list of award winners
collated, that award winner was deprived of his hard earned prize, under
very strange and inexplicable reasons. How could the GJA on one hand
give award to a journalist for a category that was not opened for
competition, and on the other hand, deprive another who genuinely won a
competitive category. Is that how GJA celebrates journalism excellence?
The
third issue that reeks of dishonesty regarding the awards is about the
education category. How can one award be given to two different winners.
Wherein then lies competition and excellence? Excellence requires that
although many reporters might have submitted very good stories, only one
of them is adjudged the best.
Consider this scenario. Five
persons work on just one story, and one person works on another story.
Now, the two stories are considered to be very good but only one must
emerge as the best. Surely, to give the award to the person who worked
alone, rather than make it a joint award with five other reporters, is a
logic that is not far-fetched. Why then should that reporter have to
share the prize with a whole team of reporters? Favouritism?
It
will also be very interesting to find out from the GJA why the
Government Statistician, Dr Grace Bediako used the platform of the 15 th
GJA Awards ceremony last year to announce that the Ghana Statistical
Service would give two awards for the best journalist and media
organization that performed most creditably in the coverage of the 2010
Population and Housing Census, and yet nothing of the sort took place.
The GJA must explain.
The intention to raise these issues is not
to call the integrity of the GJA executive to question, rather it is to
ensure that the GJA Awards remain a celebration of journalism
excellence and not dishonesty.
Thank you.
Thomas Tetteh
(Freelance journalist)
thomas.tetteh AT yahoo.com